Downregulation of miR-503 Promotes ESCC Cell Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion by Targeting Cyc

Lanfang Jiang a, Zitong Zhao b , Leilei Zheng c , Liyan Xue d, Qimin Zhan e,Yongmei Song *,f   2017-07-05 23:26:27

State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China

Received 15 March 2017; revised 17 April 2017; accepted 21 April 2017

Available online 9 June 2017

Handled by Yangming Wang

KEYWORDS

Esophageal squamous cell

carcinoma;

miR-503;

Cyclin D1;

Proliferation;

Migration and invasion

Abstract Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of the most aggressive cancers in China, but the underlying molecular mechanism of ESCC is still unclear. Involvement of microRNAs has been demonstrated in cancer initiation and progression. Despite the reported function of miR-503 in several human cancers, its detailed anti-oncogenic role and clinical significance in ESCC remain undefined. In this study, we examined miR-503 expression by qPCR and found the downregulation of miR-503 expression in ESCC tissue relative to adjacent normal tissues. Further investigation in the effect of miR-503 on ESCC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion showed that enhanced expression of miR-503 inhibited ESCC aggressive phenotype and overexpression of CCND1 reversed the effect of miR-503-mediated ESCC cell aggressive phenotype. Our study further identified CCND1 as the target gene of miR-503. Thus, miR-503 functions as a tumor suppressor and has an important role in ESCC by targeting CCND1.

Introduction

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the fourth leading cause of cancerrelated death in China, and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) accounts for 90% of EC [1,2]. Despite the great efforts in the development of preventive approaches, diagnostic technologies, and treatment modalities made for ESCC, thefive-year survival rate of ESCC is below 20% and the exact molecular mechanism and pathological process of ESCC remain poorly elucidated [3]. Therefore, understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms might provide novel insights into the prevention and treatment of ESCC.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are non-coding RNAs, which can bind to their target protein-coding genes at their 30 UTRs based on sequence complementarity, consequently affecting the mRNA stability or interfering with protein translation [4–8]. miRNAs play crucial roles in carcinogenesis and cancer development, and a growing body of evidence has shown that many miRNAs are aberrantly expressed and dysfunctional in ESCC [9–11]. For instance, miR-425 expression is significantly upregulated in ESCC [12]. miR-377 suppresses ESCC initiation and development by targeting VEGF and CD133 [13]. The deregulation of miR-503 has been reported in various human cancers [14–18]. miR-503 can repress epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and inhibit metastasis of osteosarcoma by targeting cmyb [14]. It can also inhibit glioma cell proliferation and invasion by targeting L1CAM encoding L1 cell adhesion molecule [15]. CCND1, which encodes cyclin D1, is the target of miR503 in breast cancer cells and endometrioid endometrial cancer [16,17]. A significant elevation in miR-503 expression has been reported in the human ESCC cell line EC9706 compared to the normal human esophageal epithelial cell (HEEC), whereas downregulated miR-503 expression suppresses proliferation, migration, and invasion in EC9706 cells [18]. However, the expression of miR-503 in other ESCC cell lines and ESCC tissues has not been reported, and whether miR-503 has the tumor suppressive role in ESCC remains to be addressed.

In this study, we demonstrated that the expression of miR503 was suppressed in ESCC tissue, whereas overexpression of miR-503 inhibited aggressive phenotypes of ESCC cells in vitro. Cyclin D1 is an important protein during the development of ESCC, and CCND1 was demonstrated to be the target of miR-503. Ourfindings provide a mechanism by which miR503 mediates ESCC malignant phenotype formation.

Results

miR-503 expression is downregulated in human ESCC tissue samples and cell lines

Many ESCC cell lines, such as KYSE30 and KYSE450, have been employed for ESCC studies and each cell line may reflect a different aspect of ESCC features [3]. We thus examined the endogenous expression of miR-503 in 10 commonly-used ESCC cell lines, using the immortalized esophageal epithelial cell line NE2 as a control. qPCR analysis showed that compared to the NE2 cell line, miR-503 expression was markedly decreased in most of the ESCC cell lines examined (Figure 1A).

Currently, there is no report on the expression of miR-503 in ESCC tissues. We next used qPCR to evaluate miR-503 expression in 71 pairs of tumor samples and the adjacent non-tumorous tissue samples from ESCC patients. Our data showed that compared to the adjacent non-tumorous tissues from the same patient, there is a significant decrease in miR503 expression in the tumor samples from 83% of the ESCC patients (P = 0.0021, Figure 1B and C).

To evaluate the possible association between miR-503 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of ESCC patients, we then analyzed the miR-503 expression levels regarding the clinicopathological information of ESCC patients using Pearson’s v2 test. However, we did not find significant association between miR-503 expression and gender, age, or lymph node metastasis (Table 1).

miR-503 negatively regulates proliferation, migration, and invasion and could induce G1/S arrest of ESCC cells

Downregulation of miR-503 expression in ESCC cell lines and tissues relative to normal human esophageal epithelial cell and adjacent normal tissues indicates miR-503 might be a negative regulator of tumorigenesis in ESCC. To explore the function of miR-503 in ESCC, a transient transfection strategy was employed to perform gain-of-function and loss-of-function assays. YES-2 and KYSE30 cell lines, which possessed low expression level of miR-503, were chosen to transfect the mimic, whereas KYSE450 and KYSE510 cell lines, which displayed high expression level of miR-503, were chosen to transfect the inhibitor. qPCR analysis showed that the expression of miR-503 was significantly increased by mimic transfection (P < 0.001, Figure 1D) and significantly decreased by inhibitor transfection (P < 0.001, Figure 1E).

We next conducted cell phenotype assays to evaluate the effects of manipulating miR-503 expression on cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. Using the RTCA-MP system, we found that the proliferation ability of YES-2 and KYSE30 cells transfected with miR-503 mimic was markedly attenuated compared to the cells transfected with negative control (Figure 2A). In addition, Transwell assay showed that migration and invasion abilities of YES-2 and KYSE30 cells transfected with miR-503 mimic were significantly decreased compared to the cells transfected with negative control (P < 0.001, Figure 2B). Similar experiments were also performed in KYSE450 and KYSE510 cells transfected with the inhibitor of miR-503. As expected, silenced miR-503 expression with inhibitor in KYSE450 and KYSE510 increased cell proliferation, migration, and invasion ability, compared to the cells transfected with the control (Figure 3).

Given the suppressive effect of miR-503 on cell proliferation, we speculate that miR-503 might affect cell cycle. We thus carried outflow cytometry for cell cycle analysis. As a result, we found a significant increase in the percentage at G1 phase and a significant decrease at S phase and G2 phase of the YES-2 cells transfected with miR-503 mimic, as compared to cells transfected with the negative control (P < 0.001, Figure 4A). A similar pattern was also observed for KYSE30 cells (Figure 4B). These results indicate that miR-503 could induce cell cycle G1/S arrest.

miR-503 negatively regulates cyclin D1 expression

The results above indicated that miR-503 might function as a tumor suppressor in ESCC. To further explore its molecular mechanisms, we firstly predicted the candidate target genes of miR-503 using TargetScan7.0 (http://www.targetscan.org) and miRDB (http://www.mirdb.org/miRDB/). As a result, 6 candidate genes that contain miR-503 binding sequence in their 30UTRs were commonly found using these two bioinformatics methods (Figure 5A). Among them, CCND1 has been reported as oncogene before [16,17], whereas the functions of the otherfive candidate target genes in tumor have not been defined yet. We thus selected CCND1 for further investigation.Figure 1 miR-503 expression was down-regulated in ESCC tissues and cell linesA. miR-503 expression in NE2 and 10 ESCC cell lines was evaluated using qPCR and presented as fold change relative to the expression in NE2. B. Relative expression of miR-503 was evaluated using qPCR in 71 pairs of ESCC samples and the corresponding adjacent noncancerous samples. C. Down-regulation of miR-503 expression was observed in 83% of ESCC tumor samples compared to the corresponding adjacent non-cancerous tissues. D. Overexpression of miR-503 mimic in KYSE30 and YES-2 cell lines was analyzed using qPCR. E. Silencing of miR-503 expression after transfecting the inhibitor in KYSE450 and KYSE510 cell lines was analyzed using qPCR. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01,***P < 0.001, t-test. All the experiments were performed at least three times. U6 was used as the internal control for miR-503 expression.According to TargetScan7.0, CCND1 could be targeted by miR-15, miR-16, and miR-19 at different binding sites. Increased miR-16 expression has been reported in 40 ESCC tissues compared with their paired adjacent normal tissues and upregulation of miR-16 in ESCC cells could inhibit cell apoptosis and promote cell growth by regulating the protein expression of SOX6 and RECK [19]. The expression and function of miR-15 and miR-19 have not been reported before. miR-15 has two transcripts (miR-15a and miR-15b), and miR-19 has three transcripts (miR-19a, miR-19b-1, and miR-19b-2). We thus examined the expression of these miRNAs in NE2 and the 10 aforementioned ESCC cell lines (Figure S1). We detected expression of miR-15a, miR-15b, miR-19a, and, miR-19b-2 but not miR-19b-1 in the cell lines examined. However, none of miR-15a, miR-15b, miR-19a, miR-19b-2 showed consistent differential expression between NE2 and ESCC cells.

The complementary binding sites of miR-503 and CCND1 30UTR (nt 1960–1966) are shown in Figure 5B. To test whether CCND1 is a direct target of miR-503, we generated a pair of plasmids, i.e., pmiR-CCND1-WT plasmid, which contains CCND1 30 UTR sequence spanning the miR-503 binding site in the luciferase plasmid vector, and pmiRCCND1-MUT plasmid, which contains the corresponding mutant counterpart (Figure 5B). The luciferase construct, Renilla plasmid, and miR-503 mimic or negative control were cotransfected into YES-2 or KYSE30 cells. As shown in Figure 5B, overexpression of miR-503 significantly reduced the luciferase activity of WT plasmid, whereas luciferase activity from mutant construct was not significantly changed. These data demonstrate a direct interaction of CCND1 30 UTR with miR-503.

Figure 2 Upregulation of miR-503 expression inhibits ESCC malignant phenotype After YES-2 and KYSE30 cells were transfected with miR-503 mimic or miR-NC 24 h, their proliferation ability was detected by RTCAMP system (A), whereas migration and invasion assays were performed using Transwell (B). Original magnification, 100Â. Each bar represents the mean of three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using two-sided t-test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01,***P < 0.001.

Figure 3 Silencing of miR-503 expression promotes ESCC malignant phenotypeCells were transfected with miR-503 inhibitor or miR-NC. A. The proliferation ability was detected by RTCA-MP system 24 h after transfection. B. Migration and invasion assays were performed with Transwell 24 h after transfection. Original magnification, 100Â. Each bar represents the mean of three independent experiments and data were statistically analyzed by two-sided t-test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01,***P < 0.001.We then looked at the effects of overexpression of miR-503 on the expression level of CCND1 using si CCND1 as a positive control. As shown in Figure 5C, compared to the cells transfected with the negative control, expression of CCND1 was significantly decreased in the YES-2 and KYSE30 cells transfected with miR-503 mimic or si CCND1. Western blotting analysis further indicated that cyclin D1 expression was reduced at protein level with the overexpression of miR-503 mimic (Figure 5D).

miR-503 expression is inversely correlated with CCND1 expression in ESCC tissues

Protein expression of cyclin D1 in NE2 and the ten aforementioned ESCC cell lines was evaluated. Our results showed increased expression of cyclin D1 in the ESCC cell lines (Figure 5E), which is opposite to the downregulation of miR-503 expression observed in ESCC cell lines (Figure 1C).

We thus evaluated CCND1 expression in the tumor tissues from ESCC patients. qPCR results revealed that CCND1 expression was significantly upregulated in ESCC tissues compared to the adjacent non-tumorous samples (P < 0.001; Figure 5F). Moreover, we plotted the relative expression of miR-503 against that of CCND1 in the patients (Figure 5G). Our data revealed a significant negative correlation between CCND1 expression and miR-503 expression in ESCC tumor samples (P < 0.001, r = À0.523, Pearson).Figure 4 Upregulation of miR-503 expression induces cell cycle G1/S arrestESCC cell lines YES-2 A. and KYSE30 B. were transiently transfected with miR-NC or miR-503 mimic. Flow cytometry was performed 24 h after transfection. The histograms of PI staining are presented in the upper panels. Percentage of cells at G1, S, and G2 phases of the cell cycles representing the average of triplicate experiments is presented in the bottom panels for quantification. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01,***P < 0.001.Overexpression of CCND1 could partially diminish the tumor suppression of ESCC by miR-503

E-cadherin and vimentin are associated with cell motility and tumor metastasis. To explore the molecular mechanism of miR-503 in ESCC, we overexpressed miR-503 in YES-2 and KYSE30 cell lines in the presence or absence of CCND1 overexpression. We found that overexpressing miR-503 led to the decreased protein expression of cyclin D1 and vimentin but an increased expression of E-cadherin. However, the altered expression of vimentin and E-cadherin can be partially reversed by overexpressing CCND1 in YES-2 and KYSE30 cell lines (Figure 6A).

To see whether cyclin D1 could rescue miR-503 0 s effect on ESCC, we silenced the endogenous CCND1 expression by overexpression of miR-503 mimic and of CCND1 in ESCC simultaneously. As shown in Figure 6B, silenced expression of CCND1 using si CCND1 (si CCND1 + vector) could mimic tumor suppressive effect of miR-503 mimic overexpression (mimic + vector) on ESCC cell proliferation, whereas overexpression of CCND1 (mimic + CCND1) could partially diminish the tumor suppressive effect of miR-503 on ESCC cell lines. Similarly, knocking down expression of CCND1 (si CCND1 + vector) could mimic tumor suppressive effect of miR-503 mimic (mimic + vector) on ESCC cell migration and invasion, whereas overexpression of CCND1 (mimic + CCND1) couldpartially reverse the tumor suppressive effect of miR-503 on ESCC cell lines (Figure 6C).

Discussion

Previous studies have shown that miR-503 expression is dysregulated in various physiological and pathological processes, including in human cancers. miR-503 plays a crucial role in tumorigenesis and cancer progression. It has been reported that miR-503 inhibits prostate cancer progression by repressing ZNF217 expression [20]. Additionally, miR-503 can also suppress hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis through Rho guanine nucleotide exchanger factor 19 [21].

In the present study, we demonstrated, for thefirst time, the tumor suppressive role of miR-503 in ESCC. Examination of miR-503 expression in paired clinical tumor samples of ESCC patients showed that miR-503 expression was downregulated in most ESCC tissue samples relative to adjacent normal tissues. Functional studies by manipulating miR-503 expression in different ESCC cell lines further showed that overexpression of miR-503 inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, whereas suppression of miR-503 expression had the opposite effects. These data support miR-503 as a tumor suppressor.

We also symmetrically examined miR-503 expression in 10 ESCC cell lines and revealed a general trend of decreased miR-503 expression in ESCC cells compared to the immortal-ized esophageal epithelial cell line NE2. We further showed that enhanced expression of miR-503 suppressed cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in two ESCC cell lines examined. Our observation is different from the observation reported in another ESCC cell line EC9706 with increased miR-503 expression, showing the tumor suppressive effects of the decreased miR-503 expression [18]. Such discrepancy could be due to cell specificity of the cell lines used, since ESCC is a complex disease and each ESCC cell line may have different origin and thus different characteristics.Figure 5 miR-503 regulates the expression of CCND1 by targeting its 3 0 UTR A. Venn diagram and the list of putative miR-503 target genes commonly predicted by TargetScan and miRDB. B. Predicted miR-503 target sequence in 3 0 UTR of CCND1 and the positions of mutated nucleotides (red). Relative luciferase activity of luciferase reporter plasmids containing the wild-type or mutant CCND1 3 0 UTR was determined in YES-2 and KYSE30 cells that were co-transfected with the miR-503 mimic or miR-NC. Renilla luciferase activity served as an internal control. C. qPCR analysis of CCND1 expression in YES-2 and KYSE30 cells 48 h after transfected with miR-503 mimic or negative control. D. Western blotting analysis of cyclin D1 in YES-2 and KYSE30 cells 48 h after transfected with miR-503 mimic or negative control. E. Western blotting analysis of endogenous cyclin D1 expression in NE2 and ten ESCC cell lines. F. qPCR analysis of CCND1 expression in 57 pairs of ESCC tissue samples. G. Correlation analysis of CCND1 mRNA expression and miR-503 expression in the paired ESCC tumor samples from 57 patients. Data shown in panels B, C, and F were analyzed using Student’s t-test. Pearson correlation was used to calculate r and P values in panel G. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01,***P < 0.001.miRNAs function by inhibiting the expression of target genes. Based on our data in the present study, the function of miR-503 target genes in ESCC might be associated with proliferation and metastasis. Overexpression of cyclin D1 is frequently observed in a variety of tumors, especially in ESCC [22–24]. There are many factors contributing to the overexpression of cyclin D1 in cancer, such as amplification and abnormal transcription of CCND1 [22–26]. As a key mediator of cell cycle progression, cyclin D1 forms complex with cyclindependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and CDK6 to inactivate the retinoblastoma (RB) pathway via hyperphosphorylation of the RB protein and result in acceleration of E2F-mediated gene transcription [27]. Blockage of cyclin D1 expression could induce cell cycle G1/S phase arrest, thus leading to the inhibition of cell proliferation [25,26]. Interestingly, our study shows that overexpression of miR-503 in ESCC cell lines also induced G1/S arrest. In agreement with this observation, we found that cyclin D1 is the direct target of miR-503 by dual-luciferase reporter assay and western blot. Therefore, miR-503 could inhibit ESCC cell proliferation by targeting CCND1 and inducing cell cycle G1/S arrest.Figure 6 Overexpression of CCND1 could partly diminish the tumor suppressive effect of miR-503 on ESCCYES-2 and KYSE30 cells were cotransfected with miR-503 mimic, CCND1 siRNA or negative control and pcDNA3.1-vector or pcDNA3.1-CCND1 and incubated for 24 h. A. Western blotting analysis of cyclin D1, vimentin, and E-cadherin using b-actin as a loading control. B. The proliferation ability of YES-2 and KYSE30 cells after various transfections was evaluated using RTCA-MP system. C. Migration and invasion assays of YES-2 and KYSE30 cells after various transfections were performed using Transwell. Original magnification, 100Â. Each bar represents the mean of three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using the two-sided t-test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01,***P < 0.001.Cyclin D1 is also reported to be involved in the regulation of tumor metastasis [28–30]. CCND1-deficient mice exhibit the tumor resistance because of the reduced motility and invasiveness of CCND1À/À tumor-associated macrophages [28,29]. Decreased cyclin D1 and cyclin D1-CDK4/6 kinase activity reduces invasion and migration in breast cancer cells [30]. Cyclin D1/P21 regulates breast cancer cell migration and invasion through TGFb pathway [31,32]. Cyclin D1 stimulated EMT factors (including E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and vimentin) through PI3K/AKT pathway [33]. In this study, we found that overexpression of miR-503 reduced the protein levels of cyclin D1 and vimentin, but increased the expression of E-cadherin, which can be partially revised by overexpression of CCND1. Moreover, silenced expression of CCND1 could recapitulate the tumor suppressive effect of miR-503 mimic on ESCC, whereas overexpression of CCND1 could partially reverse the tumor suppressive effect of miR-503 mimic on ESCC cells. Therefore, miR-503 could inhibit ESCC cell migration and invasion by targeting CCND1 through decreasing vimentin level and increasing E-cadherin level.

In conclusion, our study demonstrates that miR-503 has a tumor suppressor role in ESCC cell lines and tumor samples by negatively regulating the expression of its direct target, CCND1, in ESCC.

Materials and methods

Clinical tissue and samples

71 pairs of ESCC tumor tissues and the normal adjacent counterparts were collected from ESCC patients at the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College from 2003 to 2012. All patients have provided the written consent. The clinical information of patients included in this study is presented in Table 1.

Cell culture

Ten human ESCC cell lines were examined in this study, which were kindly provided by Professor Yutaka Shimada from Kyoto University, Japan. These include TE12, KYSE510, KYSE450, KYSE410, Colo680N, KYSE180, KYSE140, YES2, KYSE150, and KYSE30. The cells were maintained in RPIM-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics. The immortalized esophageal epithelial cell line NE2 was provided by Professor Enmin Li from Shantou University. These cells are cultured in a 1:1 mixture of EpiLife and dKSFM (Gibco) as described previously [3].

Cell transfection

miR-503 mimic, inhibitor, and siRNA for CCND1 were purchased from RiboBi (Guangzhou, China) for transient transfection. Transfection was performed at the final concentration of 25 nM for mimic, 75 nM for inhibitor, 50 nM for si CCND1 with Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California) as instructed by the manufacturer.

RNA extraction and real-time PCR

RNA was extracted using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen). 2 mg total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis with Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.qPCR was conducted to determine the expression levels of hsa-miR-503 and CCND1 mRNA using Applied Biosystems 7300 Real-Time PCR System, with the U6 small nuclear RNA and GAPDH as internal controls, respectively. The sequences of the primers used are listed in Table S1.

qPCR data were quantified according to the 2ÀDCT method, and data analysis was performed and visualized using GraphPad Prism v.5.

Cell proliferation assay

Cell proliferation assay was performed using RTCA-MP system as described previously [12,34].

Migration and invasion assays

Migration and invasion assays were performed with Transwell insert chambers (Corning, New York, NY) as described previously [12] with a density of 2 Â 105 ESCC cells were seeded in the upper chambers of Transwell and incubated for 24 h. Cells werefixed in methanol for 5 min and stained with crystal violet for 5 min. The migrated cells were examined under a phasecontrast microscope for imaging analysis. Cells in nine random microscopicfields (100 Â magnification) were counted per well. For the invasion assay, the upper chamber membrane was precoated with 100 ll of 2% Matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and similar steps were performed as for the migration assay.

Luciferase reporter assay

The CCND1 30 UTR wild type fragment (WT) and mutant fragment (MUT) were separately inserted in the firefly luciferase gene downstream in the pmirGLO (Generay, Shanghai, China) plasmid. Cells were cotransfected with WT or MUT plasmid and miRNA negative control or miR-503 mimic using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen). 36 h after transfection, cell lysates were collected for measurement of the luciferase activities (normalized to luciferase activity of the Renilla) using Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.

Western blotting analysis

Western blot analysis was performed as described previously [12]. Primary antibodies used in this study include anti-bactin, anti-vimentin, anti-cyclin D1, and anti-E-cadherin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). The horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies used include goat-anti-mouse IgG (1:2000) and goat-anti-rabbit IgG (1:3000). After incubation with chemiluminescence substrate, images of protein bands were taken by Image Reader LAS4000 (Fuji Ltd, Osaka, Japan) and then analyzed using Multi Gauge V3.2 software.

Flow cytometric analysis

Cells werefixed in 100% methanol for 30 min at À20 °C, and then resuspended in 300 ll propidium iodide (PI) staining solution (0.5 mg/ml PI). Cell-cycle progression was analyzed with a LSRIIflow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and Modifit3.1 Crack analysis software.

Statistical analysis

All the data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 17.0). Differences between groups were analyzed using the Student’s t-test (two-tailed). Association between miR-503 expression and various clinicopathological parameters was determined using a Pearson’s chi-squared (v2) test [13]. Correlation Pear-son analysis was performed to evaluate the association between miR-503 expression and CCND1 expression and calculate coefficient (r) and P values. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01,*** P < 0.001 versus control.

Authors’ contributions

YS designed the study. LJ conducted the experiments. ZZ, LZ, and LX collected the ESCC tissues and performed the pathological analysis. LJ, ZZ, YS, and QZ wrote the manuscript. All authors had read, edited, and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors have declared no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81472661 and 81402463) and CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS; Grant No. 2016-I2M-1-001).

Supplementary material

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. gpb.2017.04.003.

References

[1] Xu Y, Yu X, Chen Q, Mao W. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant treatment: which one is better for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? World J Surg Oncol 2012;10:173.

[2] Hosch SB, Stoecklein NH, Pichlmeier U, Rehders A, Scheune-mann P, Niendorf A, et al. Esophageal cancer: the mode of lymphatic tumor cell spread and its prognostic significance. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:1970–5.

[3] Song Y, Li L, Ou Y, Gao Z, Li E, Li X, et al. Identification of genomic alterations in oesophageal squamous cell cancer. Nature 2014;509:91–5.

[4] Shi XF, Wang H, Xiao FJ, Yin Y, Xu QQ, Ge RL, et al. miRNA-486 regulates angiogenic activity and survival of mesenchymal stem cells under hypoxia through modulating Akt signal. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2016;470:670–7.

[5] Rupaimoole R, Calin GA, Lopez-Berestein G, Sood AK. miRNA deregulation in cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Discov 2016;6:235–46.

[6] Li Y, Cai B, Shen L, Dong Y, Lu Q, Sun S, et al. miRNA-29b suppresses tumor growth through simultaneously inhibiting angiogenesis and tumorigenesis by targeting Akt3. Cancer Lett 2017;397:111–9.

[7] Ru P, Steele R, Newhall P, Phillips NJ, Toth K, Ray RB.miRNA-29b suppresses prostate cancer metastasis by regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition signaling. Mol Cancer Ther 2012;11:1166–73.

[8] Xie F, Yuan Y, Xie L, Ran P, Xiang X, Huang Q, et al. miRNA-320a inhibits tumor proliferation and invasion by targeting c-Myc in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther 2017;10:885–94.

[9] Liu H, Ren G, Zhu L, Liu X, He X. The upregulation of miRNA-146a inhibited biological behaviors of ESCC through inhibition of IRS2. Tumour Biol 2016;37:4641–7.

[10] Fu HL, Wu DP, Wang XF, Wang JG, Jiao F, Song LL, et al.Altered miRNA expression is associated with differentiation, invasion, and metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in patients from Huaian China. Cell Biochem Biophys 2013;67:657–68.

[11] Ma J, Hong L, Xu G, Hao J, Wang R, Guo H, et al. miR-483-3p plays an oncogenic role in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by targeting tumor suppressor EI24. Cell Biol Int 2016;40: 448–55.

[12] Liu L, Zhao Z, Zhou W, Fan X, Zhan Q, Song Y. Enhanced expression of miR-425 promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma tumorigenesis by targeting SMAD2. J Genet Genomics 2015;42:601–11.

[13] Li B, Xu WW, Han L, Chan KT, Tsao SW, Lee NP, et al.MicroRNA-377 suppresses initiation and progression of esophageal cancer by inhibiting CD133 and VEGF. Oncogene 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2017.29.

[14] Guo X, Zhang J, Pang J, He S, Li G, Chong Y, et al. MicroRNA-503 represses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and inhibits metastasis of osteosarcoma by targeting c-myb. Tumour Biol 2016;37:9181–7.

[15] Chong Y, Zhang J, Guo X, Li G, Zhang S, Li C, et al.MicroRNA-503 acts as a tumor suppressor in osteosarcoma by targeting L1CAM. PLoS One 2014;9:e114585.

[16] Long J, Ou C, Xia H, Zhu Y, Liu D. MiR-503 inhibited cell proliferation of human breast cancer cells by suppressing CCND1 expression. Tumour Biol 2015;36:8697–702.

[17] Xu YY, Wu HJ, Ma HD, Xu LP, Huo Y, Yin LR. MicroRNA-503 suppresses proliferation and cell-cycle progression of endometrioid endometrial cancer by negatively regulating cyclin D1. FEBS J 2013;280:3768–79.

[18] Zhao K, Chen BJ, Chen ZG, Zhang YJ, Xu D, Liu Q. Effect of miR-503 down-regulation on growth and invasion of esophagus carcinoma and related immune function. Med Sci Monit 2015;21:3564–9.

[19] Zhu Y, Xia Y, Niu H, Chen Y. miR-16 induced the suppression of cell apoptosis while promote proliferation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Physiol Biochem 2014;33:1340–8.

[20] Jiang X, Chen Y, Du E, Yang K, Zhang Z, Qi S, et al. GATA3-driven expression of miR-503 inhibits prostate cancer progression by repressing ZNF217 expression. Cell Signal 2016;28:1216–24.

[21] Zhou J, Tao Y, Peng C, Gu P, Wang W. miR-503 regulates metastatic function through Rho guanine nucleotide exchanger factor 19 in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Res 2014;188:129–36.

[22] Inoue K, Fry EA. Aberrant expression of cyclin D1 in cancer.Sign Transduct Insights 2015;4:1–13.

[23] Seiler R, Thalmann GN, Rotzer D, Perren A, Fleischmann A.CCND1/Cyclin D1 status in metastasizing bladder cancer: a prognosticator and predictor of chemotherapeutic response. Mod Pathol 2014;27:87–95.

[24] Umekita Y, Ohi Y, Sagara Y, Yoshida H. Overexpression of cyclin D1 predicts for poor prognosis in estrogen receptornegative breast cancer patients. Int J Cancer 2002;98:415–8.

[25] Dozier C, Mazzolini L, Cenac C, Froment C, Burlet-Schiltz O,Besson A, et al. Cyclin D-CDK4/6 complexes phosphorylate CDC25A and regulate its stability. Oncogene 2017. http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/onc.2016.506.

[26] Gu X, Xu ZY, Zhu LY, Wang LF, Li K, Pei Q. Dual control of Shuanghuang Shengbai granule on upstream and downstream signal modulators of Cyclin D-CDK4/6 signaling pathway of cell cycle in Lewis-bearing mice with cyclophosphamide-induced myelosuppression. Onco Targets Ther 2013;6:199–209.

[27] Thangavel C, Boopathi E, Liu Y, Haber A, Ertel A, Bhardwaj A,et al. RB loss promotes prostate cancer metastasis. Cancer Res 2017;77:982–95.

[28] Li X, Huo X, Li W, Yang Q, Wang Y, Kang X. Genetic association between Cyclin D1 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility. Tumour Biol 2014;35:11959–65.

[29] Neumeister P, Pixley FJ, Xiong Y, Xie H, Wu K, Ashton A, et al.Cyclin D1 governs adhesion and motility of macrophages. Mol Biol Cell 2003;14:2005–15.

[30] Zhong Z, Yeow WS, Zou C, Wassell R, Wang C, Pestell RG, et al.Cyclin D1/cyclin-dependent kinase 4 interacts withfilamin A and affects the migration and invasion potential of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 2010;70:2105–14.

[31] Dai M, Al-Odaini AA, Fils-Aime N, Villatoro MA, Guo J,Arakelian A, et al. Cyclin D1 cooperates with p21 to regulate TGFbeta-mediated breast cancer cell migration and tumor local invasion. Breast Cancer Res 2013;15:R49.

[32] Fritah A, Saucier C, Mester J, Redeuilh G, Sabbah M. p21WAF1/CIP1 selectively controls the transcriptional activity of estrogen receptor alpha. Mol Cell Biol 2005;25:2419–30.

[33] Chen Y, Jiang J, Zhao M, Luo X, Liang Z, Zhen Y, et al.microRNA-374a suppresses colon cancer progression by directly reducing CCND1 to inactivate the PI3K/AKT pathway. Oncotarget 2016;7:41306–19.

[34] Wittchen ES, Hartnett ME. The small GTPase Rap1 is a novel regulator of RPE cell barrier function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:7455–63.

上一篇回2017年6月第3期目录 下一篇 (方向键翻页,回车键返回目录)加入书签

© 2016 毕业论文网 > Downregulation of miR-503 Promotes ESCC Cell Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion by Targeting Cyc